University of Pennsylvania Health System

Clinical Briefings™: Clinical Reports from Penn Medicine

Thursday, May 28, 2015

Continent Urinary Diversion and Orthotopic Neobladder Surgery After Cystectomy for Invasive Bladder Cancer

Surgeons at Penn Medicine are performing continent urinary diversion and orthotopic neobladder procedures following cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer.

Surgery for high risk bladder cancer (>T2 disease or high grade non-invasive disease refractory to other treatment) is complex and combines the removal of the bladder (cystectomy) with some form of urinary tract reconstruction. Cystectomy generally involves a prostatectomy in men and a hysterectomy and partial vaginectomy in women. In both cases, a meticulous, extended pelvic lymphadenectomy is also performed.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is usually performed in the presence of muscle invasive disease, but adjuvant chemotherapy may also be used in appropriate situations. Chemotherapy, offered by the Division of Hematology/Oncology at Penn, can improve survival outcomes in patients with bladder cancer.

Urinary diversion, performed after the cystectomy, is required since the function of urine storage and emptying has been lost after the removal of the bladder. In the United States, the procedure is most often accomplished with a simple ileal loop diversion in which a short portion of small intestine is attached to the ureters from the kidneys and then brought to the skin. This is covered by an external stoma bag where urine is stored and emptied by the patient.

Since the mid 1980’s Penn surgeons have improved upon cystectomy with urinary diversion by constructing a continent neobladder that eliminates the need for a stoma bag. Neobladder reconstruction allows the patient to retain a normal body appearance and maintain urinary function while treating the cancer. Approximately 80 to 90 percent of patients nationwide receive a simple ileal loop; nearly half of Penn patients undergo continent reconstruction.

Orthotopic neobladder surgery involves the creation of a pouch in the pelvis constructed from a portion of the small bowel and anastomosed to the urethra. (Figure 1). After such surgery, patients can void through the urethra. A separate procedure, cutaneous continent diversion, involves an intra-abdominal pouch constructed from detubularized bowel and accessed from a small, flat, catheterizable stoma at the skin no wider than the head of pencil eraser. These more sophisticated forms of reconstruction do not interfere with either neoadjuvant or adjuvant administration of chemotherapy.

The general goals of orthotopic neobladder surgery and cutaneous continent diversion include the creation of a reservoir with adequate capacity, urinary continence during normal activity and volitional emptying. The majority of patients (approximately 98%) regain daytime continence. Some patients may have urinary seepage in the evening (10-15%) which is correctable with pelvic floor training and evening fluid intake.


Case Study
Mr. Y, a 62 yr old male, was referred to Penn Urology following an episode of gross hematuria, after which a cystoscopic exam demonstrated a sessile lesion in the posterior wall of the bladder. On final pathology, Mr. Y was noted to have tumor invasion in the muscularis propria of the bladder. A metastatic evaluation consisting of a chest and abdominal CT revealed no sign of metastases or lymphadenopathy. Mr. Y reported a 30-pack/year smoking history, but no family history of cancer. His medical history included two cardiac stents placed within the past five years for cardiovascular disease.

After a thorough consideration of his options, Mr. Y chose to have a cysto-prostatectomy with a neobladder and lymph node dissection. He was scheduled for surgery within six weeks. Because his clinically displayed disease was low volume, Mr. Y chose not to have chemotherapy prior to surgery.

Mr. Y’s surgery was initiated with a lower midline incision and exposure of the pelvic organs, during which the ureters were identified and mobilized and an extensive pelvic lymph node dissection was performed. A cystectomy and prostatectomy were then performed with attention to preservation of nerves and continence mechanisms and without compromise to the oncologic principle of obtaining negative margins.

Once these procedures were accomplished, an appropriate segment of bowel was selected and demarcated and separated from the GI tract, but maintained on its vascular supply. A bowel anastomosis was then performed, and the bowel segment opened to provide maximal surface area and optimal volume for the neobladder (Figure 1). The pouch was then constructed and the ureters anastomosed to it to bring the kidneys and pouch into continuity.

After the construction of the pouch, it was reanstomosed to the urethra, which was determined to be healthy by a negative frozen margin. Mr. Y was hospitalized for five to eight days and returned for X-ray studies two weeks later to assess healing of the pouch.

At this point, all additional drains were removed and Mr. Y was scheduled for continence training with experts in pelvic floor rehabilitation at Penn Urology. His final pathology was pT2a N 0/48 M0. He did not have post-operative chemotherapy. At five years post-surgery, he showed no evidence of cancer recurrence.

Faculty Team
Penn urologists bring a wealth of knowledge to the care of patients with urologic problems and are known for their expertise in cancer, voiding dysfunction, urinary incontinence, stone disease, interstitial cystitis and male sexual dysfunction. Penn urologists perform an average of 50 cystectomy surgeries each year for bladder cancer.  Orthotopic neobladder surgery and cutaneous continent diversion surgeries have been performed at Penn for more than two decades.

Performing Continent Urinary Diversion and Neobladder Surgery at Penn Medicine

Urology
S. Bruce Malkowicz, MD
Professor of Urology

Thomas J. Guzzo, MD, MPH
Assistant Professor of Urology in Surgery

Medical Oncology
David J. Vaughn, MD
Professor of Medicine
Vice Chief for Clinical Affairs, Division of Hematology/Oncology,
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Ronac Mamtani, MD, MSCE
Assistant Professor of Medicine

Access
Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine
West Pavilion, 3rd Floor
3400 Civic Center Boulevard
Philadelphia, PA 19104


https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0vaPQ5yI4B3bGRRb09oUWZTWEE/view?usp=sharing

Enrolling Clinical Trials: Dose Escalation of Neoadjuvant Proton Radiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer



Radiation oncologists at the Roberts Proton Therapy Center and the Abramson Cancer Center are conducting a clinical trial [1] to investigate the use of preoperative carboplatin/paclitaxel in combination with proton therapy followed by surgery for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Esophageal cancer is the third most common gastrointestinal malignancy. There are two histologies––adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma––with adenocarcinoma prevailing in North America.
The primary treatment at every stage is surgery (transhiatal or transthoracic esophagectomy), often in combination with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. With the publication of the CROSS trial, trimodality therapy comprising preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery became the treatment of choice for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

The CROSS trial found a significant benefit for CRT followed by surgery versus surgery alone, with a median overall survival of 49.4 months in the CRT-surgery group versus 24.0 months in the surgery group. Rates of recurrence were also substantially lower in the CRT-surgery group.

Surgery is a mainstay of curative therapy in esophageal cancer, but is associated with post-operative morbidity and occasional mortality, even in experienced hands. In order to develop a strategy to avoid surgery, improvements in CRT complete response rates (currently 25%-40% at the time of surgery) will need to be substantially improved. Additionally, criteria will need to be developed to determine which patients may benefit from the preclusion of resective therapy.

The Role of Imaging
Bio-imaging molecular markers, such as 18F-FDG (fluorodeoxyglucose) PET, and biomarkers (e.g., circulating tumor cells) may be able to identify patients who respond favorably to treatment. For patients with esophageal cancer, the use of 18F-FDG PET as part of the initial work-up is considered standard for identifying metastatic disease. 18F-FDG PET is also commonly used after chemoradiation to see if metastatic disease has developed prior to surgery. It is possible that interim 18F-FDG PET/CT scans during CRT may help predict responders.

Proton Therapy in Esophageal Cancer
The treatment of esophageal cancer with standard radiation is complicated by the organ’s proximity to a number of critical radiosensitive organs, including the heart and lungs. Proton therapy provides an improvement over standard radiotherapy in its ability to deliver a high dose to tumor targets while maintaining lower doses to surrounding normal tissues. This is possible because proton radiation has a rapid dose fall-off at the distal edge of the target (Bragg-Peak effect), a characteristic that allows for significant reductions in radiation dose to normal organs and the potential for dose escalation.

1. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02213497. Available at: http://1.usa.gov/1H8emls

Investigating Preoperative Proton Radiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer at Penn
Background: A clinical trial of proton therapy in the setting of preoperative radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. This trial seeks to determine the maximally tolerated radiation dose of dose-escalated proton radiotherapy and to assess the utility of bio-imaging molecular markers to identify patients who will respond favorably to treatment.

Objectives: To identify the maximally tolerated radiation dose (MTD) of dose-escalated proton radiotherapy in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel in the preoperative setting for esophageal cancer; to estimate pathologic response rates by esophagectomy surgical specimens after escalated doses of chemoradiotherapy; to evaluate the utility of mid-treatment 18F-FDG PET imaging at week 4 as a molecular imaging marker to predict treatment response to chemoradiotherapy; and to assess the utility of circulating tumor cells as biomarkers to predict treatment response to chemoradiotherapy.

Methods: Patients will be treated with preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgical resection. Concurrent chemoradiation will consist of weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel for 5 weeks, from start until completion of proton therapy. Radiation therapy dose will be escalated to determine the MTD using a 3+3 phase I study design. Patients will receive once daily proton radiotherapy.

There will be two target volumes: a larger elective volume and a boost volume to include the gross tumor plus additional margin. This boost volume will be treated with the dose escalation schema. Patients will have surgery 4 - 8 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy. Ancillary studies include collection of patient serum for analysis of CTCs, as well as 18F-FDG PET imaging at week 4. However, 18F-FDG PET imaging pre-treatment and ~4 weeks after chemoradiation are standard of care and are not research procedures.

Inclusion Criteria: Patients with esophageal cancer to be treated with concurrent preoperative chemoradiation with carboplatin and paclitaxel.

Contact: The principal investigator for this trial is John Plastaras, MD, PhD. For information, prospective patients and/or their clinicians may call 215-615-8078, or email
PennCancerTrials@emergingmed.com

Faculty Team
Among the largest and most respected programs in the world, Penn Radiation Oncology offers a variety of innovative treatment options to patients with cancer. In addition, as a national leader in basic science, translational research and clinical trials, Penn Radiation Oncology offers patients access to the latest treatment options––including proton therapy––before they are widely available elsewhere.

Performing Clinical Research in Proton Therapy for Esophageal Cancer at Penn Medicine
 

Radiation Oncology
John P. Plastaras MD, PhD
Assistant Professor of Radiation Oncology

James M. Metz, MD
Professor and Chair of Radiation Oncology

Edgar Ben-Josef, MD
Vice Chair of Translational Research
Professor of Radiation Oncology

J. Nicholas Lukens, MD
Clinical Instructor of Radiation Oncology

Medical Oncology
Bruce Giantonio, MD
Professor of Medicine

Arturo Loaiza-Bonilla, MD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine

Peter O’Dwyer, MD
Professor of Medicine

Ursina Teitelbaum, MD
Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine

Paul S. Wissel, MD
Adjunct Professor of Medicine

Surgery
John Kucharczuk, MD
Chief, Division of Thoracic Surgery
Associate Professor of Surgery

Noel N. Williams, MD
Professor of Clinical Surgery

Access
Penn Radiation Oncology
Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine
Concourse Level
3400 Civic Center Boulevard
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Abramson Cancer Center
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
Medical Arts Building, Suite 103A
51 N 39th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104



https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0vaPQ5yI4B3ZUpLZ3JINXVWck0/view?usp=sharing





Monday, April 20, 2015

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for Esophageal Achalasia


Gastroenterological endoscopists at Penn Medicine are now performing incisionless Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) to treat esophageal achalasia.

Achalasia is a rare idiopathic motility disorder that manifests as hypertension and incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and aperistalsis of the esophageal body. The disorder is a result of impairment of the smooth muscle fibers, leading to failure of bolus transit through the esophagus. Symptoms include dysphagia, regurgitation, heartburn and chronic chest pain, with the consequent potential for weight loss, malnutrition and pulmonary sequelae.

Following diagnosis of esophageal achalasia by esophageal manometry and barium swallow esophagram, the standard surgical treatment is the Heller myotomy. First performed in 1914, Heller myotomy involves cutting the muscles of the LES to open the valve and permit food and liquids to pass into the stomach. Laparoscopic multi-port Heller myotomies are now the preferred approach. Post-operative complications may include infection, bleeding and rarely, esophageal or gastric perforation. The Heller procedure is often combined with fundoplication to prevent gastroesophageal reflux.

Alternatives to surgery for the treatment of achalasia include balloon dilation to expand the constricted sphincter and injections of botulinum directly into the esophagus to relax spastic muscle contractions. Both treatments are effective in the short term, but may require repeated administration to improve the symptoms of achalasia.

A more recent innovation, Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) has been developed in Japan by Haruhiro Inoue, MD, PhD, who guided the introduction of the procedure at Penn Medicine. POEM involves the use of endoscopic tools to perform an intramural myotomy (as opposed to the extramural Heller procedure). A full description of the procedure can be found in the Case Study below.

In Dr. Inoue’s original series of 70 cases at Showa University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan, [1] POEM resulted in significant reductions in LES pressure (elevated in most patients with achalasia) and subjective symptom score. Marked improvement was noted in endoscopic appearance and esophageal emptying on barium swallow. Symptomatic post-POEM gastroesophageal reflux disease was observed in 11.4% of patients, but all were successfully treated with standard proton pump inhibitors.

Reference
1. Minami H, Inoue H, Haji A, et al. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy: Emerging indications and evolving techniques. Digestive Endoscopy 2015; 27: 175–181.



Case Study

Mr. Y, age 43 years, was referred to Penn Gastroenterology eight months after a botulinum toxin injection procedure for diagnosed achalasia at a hospital near his home in New Jersey.

Mr. Y’s symptoms at this time included protracted post-prandial pain, dysphagia to both solids and liquids and occasional vomiting.

The botulinum toxin injection procedure provided some immediate relief, but within three to six weeks, his symptoms began a slow and progressive return. Mr. Y was in otherwise good health.

At Penn, a barium esophagram revealed esophageal dilatation and stenosis of the cardiac region of the esophagus with delayed evacuation of the barium meal (Fig. 1) . After a consultation to discuss his options, it was agreed that Mr. Y would have a POEM procedure. Mr. Y’s POEM was initiated by creating a 2 cm entry site into the mid-esophageal wall and then a tunnel in the submucosal space extending immediately beyond the esophagogastric junction to the lesser curve of the gastric cardia (Fig. 2).

Next, an inner circular muscle myotomy was performed by grasping and dividing the fibers. Following the myotomy, the endoscope was withdrawn from the submucosal tunnel and reinserted into the lumen to inspect the mucosa, ensure mucosal integrity and confirm easy passage of the endoscope through the LES consistent with an adequate myotomy. The mucosal entry site was then closed with endoscopic clips (Fig. 3).

Mr. Y was observed overnight in the Second-Stage Recovery Unit following his procedure. He received IV-hydration until post-operative day 1, when a barium esophagram was obtained. Noting no loss of mucosal integrity or leakage, Mr. Y was started on a liquid diet and discharged home. Two days later, he began a solid diet, and his recovery thereafter was unremarkable. At his six-month follow-up,
he reported a complete resolution of symptoms.



Faculty Team
The Division of Gastroenterology at Penn Medicine is comprised of a multidisciplinary team of clinician specialists who treat a variety of digestive, liver and pancreatic disorders. Many Penn gastroenterologists are actively involved in clinical research, as well, pioneering advances within their fields to bring more options to the detection and management of inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn’s disease, celiac disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease and other gastrointestinal disorders. The genetics of gastroenterological disease are a particular focus of research at Penn, as are the effects of comorbid disease and other risk factors.

Performing Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy at Penn Medicine

Gregory G. Ginsberg, MD
Director of Endoscopic Services
Professor of Medicine
Professor of Surgery in Medicine

Vinay Chandrasekhara, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine

Other collaborators include:

Daniel T. Dempsey, MD
Professor of Surgery

Kristoffel R. Dumon, MD
Assistant Professor of Surgery

Gary W. Falk, MD, MS
Professor of Medicine

David Metz, MD
Clinical Chief of Gastroenterology
Professor of Medicine

Michael L. Kochman, MD
Wilmott Family Professor of Medicine
Professor of Surgery in Medicine

Noel N. Williams, MD
Professor of Clinical Surgery


Access
Penn Gastroenterology
Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine
South Pavilion, 4th Floor
3400 Civic Center Boulevard
Philadelphia, PA 19104


Enrolling Clinical Trials at Penn Gastroenterology

Expanding the Clinical Applications of Functional Luminal Imaging (EndoFLIP) in Esophageal Stenoses

The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of a functional luminal imaging probe to characterize benign esophageal luminal strictures before and after dilation and identify predictors of response to therapy. Patients will be evaluated during endoscopy using functional luminal imaging (EndoFLIP; Crospon Medical Devices, Galway, Ireland) to characterize the geometry of benign luminal esophageal narrowing before and after dilation. Contact Maureen DeMarshall, BSN, RN, at demarshm@mail.med.upenn.edu.


Preliminary Evaluation of Septin9 in Patients With Hereditary Colon Cancer Syndromes
This is an observational, case-control study evaluating the quantitative level of Septin9 in plasma pre- and post-colectomy in patients with hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome, Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP), Lynch syndrome (also known as HNPCC), and Multiple Adenomatous Polyposis (MAP, also known as MYK/MYH), with genetically related FAP-family members as controls and references. Contact Julie Starr at (215) 349 – 8527, or jstarr@mail.med.upenn.edu.


Familial Barrett’s Esophagus (FBE)
This is a multi-center study whose aim is to define the epidemiology and genetics of Barrett’s esophagus and adenocarcinoma. The researchers have studied families affected with Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. They have found that Barrett’s and esophageal cancer occur at a younger age in these families, suggesting that familial Barrett’s esophagus is a genetically inherited disease. Contact Maureen Demarshall, RN, at demarchm@mail.upenn.edu.




https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0vaPQ5yI4B3YkpZbGJJWG5XUTg/view?usp=sharing
 




Thursday, April 16, 2015

Surgical Management of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy


Epileptologists from the departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology at Penn Medicine have recently introduced a collection of innovative technologies to better treat patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (defined as having seizures refractory to two or more seizure medications).

Medications can control seizures in about two-thirds of persons with epilepsy. The approximate one-third of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy experience a significant impact on quality of life, elevated risk of injury and increased risk of sudden unexpected death.

For patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, the options available at Penn Medicine include resective surgery and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), as well as newer approaches. Surgery has the potential to cure or decrease seizure frequency when an epileptogenic focus can be identified. Intracranial EEG evaluations are often performed to identify seizure foci prior to resection. Vagus nerve stimulation is an option for patients who are not resective surgical candidates. VNS reduces the frequency and intensity of seizures, but is not curative.

The new technologies available to treat patients with refractory epilepsy at Penn Medicine include Visualase® MRI-Guided Laser Ablation and the NeuroPace RNS® System. Penn neurosurgeons and neurologists have collaborated to introduce these advanced modalities, which can better identify the source of seizures and treat or prevent seizures in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

Visualase MRI-Guided Laser Ablation Technology

Visualase laser ablation is a technology that combines a saline-cooled 15 watt, 980-diode laser probe (less than 2 mm diameter) with real-time MRI-guidance to induce interstitial thermal ablation of targeted lesions in the brain (Fig. 1).

Pre-treatment images are acquired for target planning and an intraoperative temperature map is used to minimize damage to healthy tissue. Open surgery is not required. Patients may be awake during therapy and are usually discharged the next day.

NeuroPace RNS System

The NeuroPace RNS System is a programmable responsive neurostimulation system designed to detect and treat abnormal electrical activity in the brain. The System employs brief bursts of electrostimulation from an RNS neurostimulator implanted in the cranium to abort pre-seizure EEG patterns programmed by physicians.

Intracranial EEG (iEEG)
Structural MRI, fdg-PET and ictal scalp EEG recordings cannot identify the epileptic network in many refractory epilepsy patients having pre-surgical evaluation. For these patients, intracranial EEG (iEEG) hybrid depth and subdural grid and strip electrodes (Fig. 3) are required for long-term, high-resolution monitoring and mapping of the cortical surface. iEEG allows Penn clinicians to map the epileptic network and cortical function, making safe resective surgery with a goal of cure possible for many drug-resistant epilepsy patients.

Visualase®; 2015 Medtronic, Inc. Minneapolis, Minnesota.
NeuroPace RNS® System; 2015 NeuroPace, Inc. Mountain View, CA.

Faculty Team

The Penn Epilepsy Center (PEC) is comprised of an interdisciplinary team of clinicians dedicated to advancing the fields of invasive neurophysiology, neuroimaging and neurosurgery for patients with epilepsy in all of its forms. The PEC offers state-of-the-art diagnostic techniques, medical treatments, surgery and support to patients
with epilepsy.

 

 

 

Treating Epilepsy at Penn Medicine

Brian Litt, MD
Director, Penn Epilepsy Center
Professor of Neurology, Bioengineering and Neurosurgery

Gordon H. Baltuch, MD, PhD
Director, Center for Functional and Restorative Neurosurgery
Professor of Neurosurgery

Kathryn Davis, MD, MTR
Medical Director, Epilepsy Monitoring Unit
Assistant Professor of Neurology

Timothy H. Lucas II, MD, PhD
Director, Translational Neuromodulation Laboratory
Assistant Professor of Neurosurgery

John R. Pollard, MD
Associate Professor of Clinical Neurology

Sarah Schmitt, MD
Director, EEG Laboratory
Assistant Professor of Clinical Neurology

Danielle Becker, MD, MSc
Assistant Professor of Clinical Neurology

Doug Maus, MD, PhD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Neurology

The Penn Epilepsy Center

The Penn Epilepsy Center offers a comprehensive, individualized evaluation and a wide variety of surgical treatments for patients whose epilepsy is difficult to manage. As a Level 4 epilepsy center, we have the expertise and facilities to provide the highest-level of medical and surgical evaluation and treatment for patients with epilepsy.

The Center offers comprehensive evaluation for people who have experienced:
  • Long-standing seizures that are not adequately controlled
  • One or more seizures
  • Unacceptable side effects from epilepsy treatments
  • Unusual events that a physician believes may have been seizures

Epilepsy Monitoring Unit

The Epilepsy Monitoring Unit features a modern eight-bed unit with video EEG for the evaluation of individuals who are candidates for surgery and for differential diagnosis of “spells.” Epilepsy patients are admitted for long-term monitoring (anywhere from 3 to 7 days) and are typically weaned from medications to determine the cause and origin of seizures. Some patients undergoing this treatment require intracranial electrode monitoring. A number of other diagnostic tools may also be used to locate the origin of the seizures, including MRI, MEG, EEG, SPECT and PET.

Access

Penn Neuroscience Center
Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine
South Pavilion, 2nd Floor
3400 Civic Center Boulevard
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Pennsylvania Hospital
330 South 9th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19107

Penn Medicine Bucks County
777 Township Line Road
Yardley, PA 19067


https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0vaPQ5yI4B3cl9FR3V5N010QjA/view?usp=sharing

























Tuesday, April 7, 2015

Diagnosis and Treatment of Dry Eye Syndrome

Penn Dry Eye & Ocular Surface Center

Ophthalmologists at the Penn Dry Eye & Ocular Surface Center are applying recent advances in diagnostic technology to diagnose the primary causes of keratoconjunctivitis sicca (or dry eye syndrome) in order to optimize treatment for the condition.

Traditionally, dry eye syndrome (DES) has been thought of as a deficiency of tears at the ocular surface. Symptoms include blurred vision, scratchiness, irritation, redness or tiredness of the eyes. Recent investigations have shown, however, that DES is much more complex than previously thought, and that “tear film dysfunction syndrome” might more accurately describe the condition.

Tear film dysfunction can be broken down into two basic etiologic classifications: insufficient tear production or increased evaporation of tears from the eye surface. The tear film is made up of lipid, aqueous and mucin components. Individuals with dry eye syndrome can be deficient in any of these basic factors.

Lipid tear deficiency is most commonly caused by blepharitis or meibomian (oil producing) gland dysfunction. This leads to abnormally increased evaporation of the tears from the surface of the eye.
Mucin deficiency can be caused by conditions such as vitamin A deficiency, chemical injury, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Mucin is produced by goblet cells, and promotes even distribution of the aqueous tears over the surface of the eye.

Aqueous tear deficiency is associated with insufficient tear production. Congenital causes include conditions such as Riley-Day syndrome or familial dysautonomia. Acquired causes of aqueous tear deficiency include contact lens wear, increasing age, hormonal changes, medications, and Sjogren’s Syndrome and other autoimmune diseases.

DES is often misdiagnosed, and accurate assessment of the underlying causes of a patient’s ocular surface disease is critical. Misdiagnosis and the resulting delay in appropriate treatment can permit the continuation of destructive disease processes and can lead to eventual permanent scarring of the ocular surface.

Diagnosis
The Penn Dry Eye & Ocular Surface Center has developed a multidisciplinary approach to identify the cause of a patient’s tear film dysfunction or ocular surface disease. Ophthalmologists collaborate with specialists in other departments to provide care for any medical problems or conditions that may be contributing to the patient’s eye problems.

In the office, specially-trained ophthalmologists perform thorough evaluations of the ocular surface. These assessments may include analysis of the tear film for specific proteins, cytokines and osmolarity. Schirmer testing is used to measure tear production, while optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows quantification of tear meniscus height.

Special stains and impression cytology are used to evaluate the cornea and conjunctiva. Keratographs utilizing trans-illumination and infrared light capture detailed images of the meibomian glands in the upper and lower eyelid and lid margin. The oil or lipid layer is also measured with sophisticated surface interferometers.

Treatment Options
Management of tear film dysfunction and ocular surface disease at the Penn Dry Eye & Ocular Surface Center is tailored to the individual patient and has the objective of promoting the health of the ocular surface. Lifestyle changes, artificial tears and topical eye ointments may help patients with mild DES.

Patients with moderate to severe DES may benefit from medical treatment with immunomodulators, anti-inflammatory agents, omega-3 fatty acid supplements, autologous serum, mucolytic agents or surgical interventions such as punctal occlusion, cautery or various lid surgeries.

The specialists at the Penn Dry Eye & Ocular Surface Center also perform amniotic membrane transplantation, artificial cornea transplants (keratoprosthesis surgery) and other advanced ocular reconstructive surgeries. Therapeutic options for eyelid diseases include intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy (Fig. 2), Lipiflow, Blephex, lid debridement and meibomian gland probing (Fig. 3).

Patients may also be fitted for specialized contact lenses including various types of scleral lenses. In addition, supplemental treatments including drops, gels, ointments, vitamins, lid scrubs, warming and cooling gel packs, goggles, specialized sunglasses, etc. are offered on site for patients to purchase.

Research at the Dry Eye & Ocular Surface Center

Dry Eye Assessment and Management Study (DREAM)

The objective of the DREAM study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of supplementation with omega-3 fatty acids in relieving the symptoms of moderate to severe dry eye disease. The study is designed to test the hypothesis that omega-3 supplementation is an effective treatment for dry eye disease (DED). Please see http://1.usa.gov/13JncIl for inclusion criteria.

Primary investigator: Vatinee Bunya, MD
Contact: 215.662.8191

Evaluation of Efficacy of 20 µg/ml rhNGF New Formulation (With Anti-oxidant) in Patients With Stage 2 and 3 Neurotrophic Keratitis

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of 20 µg/ml 6 times a day of recombinant nerve-growth factor (rhNGF) eye drop solution containing anti-oxidant compared to vehicle (formulation containing anti-oxidant) given 6 times a day. The evaluation of efficacy is intended as complete healing of stage 2 (persistent epithelial defect) and 3 (corneal ulcer) neurotrophic keratitis (NK) as measured by the central reading center using corneal fluorescein staining; assessing the duration of complete healing; improvement in visual acuity and improvement in corneal sensitivity. Please see http://1.usa.gov/1B43BQr for additional information.

Primary investigator: Mina Massaro Giordano, MD
Contact: 215.662.8100

Faculty Team
Tear film dysfunction and other ocular surface diseases are treated at the Penn Dry Eye & Ocular Surface Center by specially trained ophthalmologists who have a particular interest in caring for patients with dry eye and other types of ocular surface disease. The Center involves collaboration with specialists in cornea and external disease, oculoplastics, contact lens, rheumatology, dermatology and endocrinology.

Ophthalmology
Mina Massaro-Giordano, MD
Associate Professor, Comprehensive Ophthalmology
Co-Director, Penn Dry Eye & Ocular Surface Center

Vatinee Y. Bunya, MD
Assistant Professor, Cornea & External Disease
Co-Director, Penn Dry Eye & Ocular Surface Center

Stephen E. Orlin, MD
Associate Professor, Cornea & External Disease
Director, Cornea Service

Michael E. Sulewski, MD
Clinical Associate of Ophthalmology
Chief of Ophthalmology, VA Hospital
Co-director, Cornea Service

Oculoplastics
Sonul Mehta MD
Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology

Rheumatology
Frederick B. Vivino, MD
Professor of Clinical Medicine
Director, Sjogren’s Syndrome Center
Chief of Rheumatology, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center

Chadwick R. Johr, MD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine
Co-Director of Sjogren’s Syndrome Center

Dermatology
Catherine M. Quirk, MD
Clinical Associate of Dermatology

Endocrinology
David M. Finkel, MD
Physician

Contact Lens
Diane Heistand-Talecki, COT, NCLC, FNAO
Kathy McNelis, COA, NCLC
Cynthia Silvestri, NCLC

Access
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
Scheie Eye Institute
51 N 39th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104



https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0vaPQ5yI4B3RVpuZ2c4cGtwSGs/view?usp=sharing





Complex Retrieval of Embedded Inferior Vena Cava Filters

 Department of Radiology  •  Division of Interventional Radiology

Interventional radiologists at Penn Medicine are performing retrieval of tip-embedded inferior vena cava (IVC) filters using rigid endobronchial forceps, a technique developed by Penn Interventional Radiology. The efficacy and safety of the technique has recently been confirmed in a clinical study published in the journal Radiology. [1]

The largest venous trunk in the body, the IVC is a conduit for thromboemboli originating in the legs.
Among hypercoagulable individuals, particularly those with contraindications for anticoagulant therapy, caval blood clots are a primary cause of catastrophic pulmonary embolism. Percutaneous placement of permanent or retrievable IVC filters is an effective way to trap these clots before they reach the lungs.

Although the FDA recommends that IVC filters be removed when no longer needed, it is estimated that fewer than half of retrievable devices are taken out each year. This number includes the 5 to 10 percent of retrieval attempts that fail because the filter tip is embedded in the vessel wall.

Tip-embedded filters must be removed because they present a substantial risk for vessel occlusion, fracture, and further penetration through the IVC into bowel, bone, arteries and other structures. Standard retrieval of IVC filters involves capturing the devices with snares or cones. Neither technique is effective, however, when the filter tip is embedded in the vessel wall (see Fig. 1).

Every tip-embedded filter retrieval is considered a high-risk procedure. Incomplete, failed or overly aggressive removal of the filter can result in vessel damage and/or further distortion/fracture of the filter.

IVC Filter Retrieval at Penn

For more than a decade, interventional radiologists at Penn Medicine have been developing methods to improve the results of IVC filter retrieval and to optimize retrieval of tip-embedded caval filters.

The approach to these complex retrievals involves the use of rigid endobronchial forceps placed into the IVC from the right internal jugular vein through a sheath and dissecting away engulfing tissue, grasping the filter tip and removing the device (Fig. 2). The technique incorporates several imaging modalities, including rotational venography, spot radiography, and CT venography.

In a recent retrospective study at Penn (see back page), the endobronchial forceps approach was used successfully to retrieve 109 of 114 (96%) tip-embedded IVC filters. Three minor complications and one major complication occurred (the latter involved a patient in whom the struts as well as the tip were embedded), but these resulted in no permanent sequelae.

Case Study

Mr. W, a 37-year-old man, presented to Penn Interventional Radiology with a filter embedded in the wall of his inferior vena cava. According to his medical records, he had a history of deep vein thrombosis, for which he’d been taking warfarin for some years. Recently, however, he’d experienced a bleeding ulcer, requiring him to temporarily cease taking the drug.

To protect Mr. W from pulmonary emboli in this interim, a retrievable filter was placed in his inferior vena cava at his community hospital. After Mr. W’s ulcer had healed and he re-started warfarin, he returned to the hospital to have the IVC filter removed. An inferior vena cavagram at this time showed the tip of the filter embedded in the vessel wall, however, and the retrieval attempt was abandoned.

Mr. W was then referred to Penn Interventional Radiology, where he was scheduled for a complex IVC filter retrieval after an office consultation. His anticoagulation was not interrupted for the one-hour procedure, which was performed in an outpatient setting. Following access at the right internal jugular, endobronchial forceps were used to cut away the tissue surrounding the embedded tip, allowing the filter to be grasped and removed.

Following the procedure, Mr. W was observed for two hours; he went home the same day. He had no adverse effects from the procedure and remains under the care of his family physician.

Faculty Team

The specialists with the Interventional Radiology Division at Penn Medicine offer the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of diseases using minimally invasive techniques. The Division is situated in six interventional radiology suites at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, and has an active outpatient clinic, admitting and consulting service.

Performing Complex IVC Retrievals at Penn Medicine

Scott O. Trerotola, MD
Stanley Baum Professor of Radiology
S. William Stavropoulos, MD
Professor of Radiology

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Mandeep S. Dagli, MD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Radiology
Stephen Hunt, MD
Instructor in Radiology
Maxim Itkin, MD
Adjunct Associate Professor of Radiology
Jeffrey I. Mondschein, MD
Associate Professor of Clinical Radiology
Gregory Nadolski, MD
Assistant Professor of Radiology
Richard Shlansky-Goldberg, MD
Professor of Radiology
Michael C. Soulen, MD
Professor of Radiology
Deepak Sudheendra, MD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Radiology
Micah Watts, MD
Adjunct Assistant Professor of Radiology

Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
Timothy W.I. Clark, MD
Associate Professor of Clinical Radiology
Jonas Redmond, MD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Radiology

Pennsylvania Hospital
Raymond Fabrizio, MD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Radiology
Benjamin D. Hammelman, MD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Radiology

Access

Penn Interventional Radiology
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
1 Silverstein
3400 Spruce Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
4 Wright-Saunders Building
51 North 39th Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Penn Radiology
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Ground Dulles
3400 Spruce Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0vaPQ5yI4B3dXBlYzFnay1lZlk/view?usp=sharing
 




Tuesday, March 17, 2015

Total Proctocolectomy with J-pouch Reconstruction for Ulcerative Colitis

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery

Colorectal surgeons at Penn Medicine are performing total proctocolectomy with J-pouch reconstruction/intestinal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).

Since its introduction in the US in the 1980s, this procedure has undergone technical changes that make it much better tolerated, with improved outcomes and faster recovery. In selected individuals, it replaces total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy, and allows for the retention of gastrointestinal continuity—a major concern for all patients.

Emergent indications for surgery in UC include acute flares refractory to medical control, sudden, severe disease manifesting as uncontrolled bleeding in the colon, toxic megacolon, and perforation of the bowel. By contrast to Crohn’s disease, UC is cured by removal of the diseased colon and rectum.

At Penn Medicine, elective total proctocolectomy with J-pouch for UC is offered to patients who have pre-cancerous or dysplastic colonic mucosal changes and to those patients refractory to medical management with intolerable symptoms such as frequency, pain and urgency leading to a progressive decline in quality of life. Because the rate of synchronous or subsequent adenocarcinoma ranges from 10%-50% in this population, both high- and low-grade dysplasia constitute indications for proctocolectomy.

Total proctocolectomy with J-pouch reconstruction is most commonly performed in either two or three stages depending on the condition of the patient. Three-stage procedures are performed for acutely or chronically ill malnourished individuals, patients on high doses of immunosuppressive medications, or those who present emergently with the indications for surgery listed above.

The first stage is a laparoscopic total colectomy with preservation of the rectum and end ileostomy in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen (Figure 1). Sparing the rectum in these circumstances is important. Proctectomy is often the most technically challenging of the procedure. Performing this part of the operation in a well-nourished, healthy, immunocompetent individual reduces morbidity and makes J-pouch creation safer by improving outcomes and reducing septic complications. The second part of the procedure occurs about 3-4 months later depending on the patient’s performance status. This step involves removal of the rectum, creation of the J-pouch from the terminal ileum (about 20 cm) and temporary loop ileostomy to divert the fecal stream proximal to the J-pouch. About two months after J-pouch creation (after the pouch is checked via gastrograffin enema for leaks, sinus tracts or defects) the loop ileostomy is closed through a small peristomal incision (Figure 2).

Two stage procedures are done frequently in well-nourished patients who present electively for proctocolectomy for indications such as dysplasia or failure of medical management. Patients are screened for malnutrition, and are asked to stop anti-TNF therapy about one month in advance of the procedure. Prednisone doses higher than 20mg/day have been associated with J-pouch leaks/complications; thus consideration for a three stage procedure is warranted if higher doses of steroids are required.

Case Study

Mr. V, a 37-year-old with medically refractory ulcerative colitis, was referred to Penn Medicine for evaluation. A review of his medical history indicated that Mr. V’s disease began in his late teens. At this time, his symptoms included bloody diarrhea, bloating, acute pain and cramping.

In the decades since, his UC had responded for varying periods of time to mesalazine, azathioprine, prednisone and finally, infliximab. Each medication brought about a remission followed by a gradual return of symptoms and flare-ups, the most recent of which was attended by 20 to 30 bowel movements a day, dramatic weight loss and hospitalization.

At the time of admission, Mr. V was taking infliximab every two weeks, and was on 30 mg prednisone daily. After a consultation to discuss further medical therapy with other anti TNF-alpha alternatives, it was discovered that Mr. V had considered surgery, but was reluctant because he felt he was too young for an ileostomy.

After counseling, and in consultation with the Division of Gastroenterology, there was agreement that Mr. V would have a total proctocolectomy with J-pouch reconstruction, and that his acute presentation, relative malnutrition and immunosuppression required that the surgery proceed in three stages.

Mr. V returned home two days after the initial step (laparoscopic subtotal colectomy with temporary end ileostomy) in the three-step procedure. In the next four months, he gained almost twenty pounds while gradually weaning himself from prednisone. His sleep improved and for the first time in several years, he was able to begin moderate exercise. Returning for the proctectomy and creation of the J-pouch and temporary loop ileostomy, Mr. V spent another three days in the hospital, then returned home. Two months later his ileostomy was reversed.

Today, at a year post-surgery, he has between four and six bowel movements a day, with perfect control. He is exercising regularly, eating previously forbidden foods and has no activity restrictions or limitations.


Faculty Team

The Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery at Penn Medicine provides the highest quality diagnostic and surgical options for patients with colon, rectal and anal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis), diverticular disease and many other diseases of the colon, rectum and anus. The division offers sphincter-preserving colon and rectal surgery for cancer and benign disease, laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery, treatment for fecal incontinence and rectal prolapse and both operative and medical therapies for anal diseases.

Performing Total Proctocolectomy and J-Pouch Reconstruction for Ulcerative Colitis at Penn Medicine

Najjia N. Mahmoud, MD
Chief of Colon and Rectal Surgery
Associate Professor of Surgery
najjia.mahmoud@uphs.upenn.edu

Cary B. Aarons, MD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Surgery
cary.aarons@uphs.upenn.edu

Joshua I. S. Bleier, MD
Associate Professor of Clinical Surgery
joshua.bleier@uphs.upenn.edu

Skandan Shanmugan, MD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Surgery
skandan.shanmugan@uphs.upenn.edu

Access

Department of Surgery

Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine
3400 Civic Center Blvd
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Penn Medicine University City
3737 Market Street, 4th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Penn Medicine Washington Square
800 Walnut Street, 20th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19107

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0vaPQ5yI4B3bmd6WUhoc0dRQ2M/view?usp=sharing





Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Medical and Surgical Management of Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma

 Department of Thoracic Surgery • Department of Neurology

A multidisciplinary Myasthenia and Thymoma Program at Penn Medicine has been established to coordinate and expedite the management of patients with myasthenia gravis (MG), thymoma and related diseases.

Staffed by neurologists, thoracic surgeons, radiologists, ophthalmologists and many other specialists, the program has the objective of providing accurate diagnoses and medical management for MG and surgical intervention for thymoma and other thymic disorders.

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disorder caused in most patients by antibodies that destroy acetylcholine receptors (AChR) at the neuromuscular junctions of striated muscles. The resulting
loss of AChR manifests in patients with MG as progressive muscle weakness.

The course of MG is variable and symptoms are generally nonspecific, leading frequently to missed or mistaken diagnoses. Treatment for MG can substantially improve the symptoms of the disease. Thus, a missed diagnosis means, at the least, a continued deterioration in quality of life. However, for myasthenia gravis patients with thymoma (an associated disorder that affects up to a third of patients with the disease), or any of a host of comorbidities treated with drugs that inhibit neuromuscular transmission, a missed diagnosis can have profoundly deleterious effects.

At Penn, specialists across the therapeutic spectrum are trained to recognize the early signs of MG so that a confirmatory diagnosis can be made early in the course of the disease. This is typically achieved by blood tests for the presence of antibodies to acetylcholine receptors, electromyography (EMG) and if needed, single-fiber electromyography. Once confirmed, patients have radiographic scans to check for thymoma.

Medical treatment for MG at Penn may include cholinesterase inhibitors (e.g., Mestinon®), steroids and immunosuppressants, which increase the relative amount of acetylcholine by reducing the immune-mediated attack against the AChR. Two procedures are also commonly used to treat MG at Penn. The first, plasmapheresis, removes AChR antibodies from the blood through a process resembling dialysis; the second, intravenous immune globulin (IVIg) therapy, involves infusing pooled gamma globulin to restructure the immune response to AChR. Expanding upon these options, Penn is also a thriving source of clinical trials for patients who are refractory to therapy.

With improvement in MG symptoms, patients with early stage thymoma and selected individuals without thymoma may be candidates for thymectomy. When possible, robotic surgery is preferred as an alternative to sternotomy and transsternal procedures, which are associated with longer hospital stays, increased operative duration and greater blood loss.

Case Study

Mr. D, a 68-year-old man, was referred to a specialist at Penn Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery after a 15-month history of episodic choking and recurrent aspiration pneumonia. Noting mild ptosis that increased in severity upon sustained upward gaze, Mr. D was referred to Penn Neurology, where an anti–acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody (Ab) test and electromyography confirmed myasthenia gravis. A chest CT subsequently identified a 4 cm mass in the anterior mediastinum consistent with a thymoma.

Following plasmapheresis and IVIg with concomitant Mestinon® (pyridostigmine bromide) therapy, Mr. D’s symptoms improved sufficiently to permit surgery, and he was scheduled for a robotic thymectomy.

Prior to surgery, an epidural was placed to optimize postoperative pain management; a right chest approach was utilized along with a 3-port technique. Robotic dissection began with the right pericardial fat pad and progressed both cranially and to the left. Both phrenic nerves could be well visualized using the 3-dimensional camera system, and both were preserved during skeletonization, which included all the surrounding fat and tissue (Figure 1). There was no evidence of pericardial involvement as the specimen was dissected free. The brachiocephalic vein was skeletonized and dissection proceeded into the neck to include both upper poles.

On postoperative day 1, Mr. D’s single chest tube was removed and he was discharged home that afternoon on oral narcotics. He required the narcotics for only the first week, resumed his dose of Mestinon, and was able to return to his normal activities after the second week. He continues on Mestinon therapy but at a declining dose two years later.


Access

Penn Neurology
Penn Medicine University City
8th Floor
3737 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Thoracic Surgery
Penn Medicine University City
4th Floor
3737 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104


Faculty Team
The Penn Medicine Myasthenia and Thymoma Program is comprised of a multidisciplinary team of thoracic surgeons, neurologists and other specialists dedicated to the comprehensive management
of patients with myasthenia gravis and its associated effects and conditions, including thymoma.

Myasthenia and Thymoma Program Faculty Team

Cardiology
Alan D. Askenase, MD
Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine

Hematology-Oncology
Evan W. Alley, MD, PhD
Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine

Neurology
Sami L. Khella, MD
Chief, Department of Neurology, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
Professor of Clinical Neurology

Neuro-Ophthalmology
Madhura A. Tamhankar, MD
Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology

Pulmonology
Joel L. Deitz, MD
Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine

Radiology (Chest)
Warren B. Gefter, MD
Professor of Radiology

Radiation Oncology
Abigail T. Berman, MD

Thoracic Surgery
Taine T.V. Pechet, MD
Interim Chief of Surgery, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
Associate Professor of Clinical Surgery

Transfusion Medicine
Donald L. Siegel, MD, PhD
Professor of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Nicole Aqui, MD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

Additional Specialists
Christine H. Hosay, BSN,CMSN
Jeanmarie Salonia, PharmD



Computed Tomography for Thymoma
At Penn Medicine, patients with myasthenia gravis typically undergo computed tomography (CT) imaging to rule out concomitant thymoma. When a thymoma is identified (as in Figure 2), CT is used to characterize the tumor and to investigate the presence and extent of local invasion.

CT scans are also an important source of incidental findings of thymoma in patients assessed for diseases other  than myasthenia gravis.


https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0vaPQ5yI4B3cnNwcFB6cHFfbkU/edit




Tuesday, January 6, 2015

Current Aortic Aneurysm Stent Device Clinical Trials

Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy

Researchers with the Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy at Penn Medicine are conducting clinical trials to evaluate investigational stent grafts for the endovascular repair of abdominal, juxtarenal and pararenal aortic aneurysms.

Three of the studies currently enrolling at Penn are examining devices manufactured by Cook Medical (Bloomington, IN) under the Zenith brand name: the p-Branch stent graft, the Low Profile AAA Endovascular Graft, and the Branch Endovascular Graft-Iliac Bifurcation. Under the direction of principal investigator Ronald M. Fairman, MD, the studies are seeking to ascertain the safety and efficacy of these investigational devices.

The Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy has participated in virtually every stent graft clinical study in the United States since 1996. For information about enrolling in the Zenith studies and other endovascular clinical trials at Penn Medicine, please contact:

Heidi Martin, MS, Clinical Research Coordinator.

Phone: 215-662-4320

Email: Heidi.Martin@uphs.upenn.edu

Zenith® p-Branch OTS Multicenter Study

This study is investigating the safety and effectiveness of the Zenith p-Branch stent graft as an off-the-shelf option for the treatment of pararenal or juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. The p-Branch has a unique “off-the-shelf” design with pivoting renal portals that accommodate a
comprehensive range of patients.

Advantages include fenestrations incorporated in the design of the graft to maintain perfusion through the renal arteries and visceral vessels (celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery) and avoidance of open surgery. The study device(s) are inserted through a small incision near each hip and guided into place in the aorta.

Zenith® Low Profile AAA Endovascular Graft Clinical Study

This multi-center, prospective non-randomized clinical investigation is designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Zenith Low Profile AAA Endovascular Graft in conjunction with the Zenith Spiral-Z AAA Iliac Leg Graft. Study endpoints include freedom from major adverse events at 30 days and (for the treatment cohort) device success at 12 months.

These findings will be compared to performance goals derived from the results of the Zenith AAA Endovascular Graft clinical study. The Zenith Spiral-Z AAA Iliac Leg Graft is indicated for use during a primary or secondary procedure in patients who have iliac/femoral access that is both adequate and compatible with the graft’s Z-Trak® introduction system.

PRESERVE-Zenith® Iliac Branch Clinical Study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Zenith Branch Endovascular Graft-Iliac Bifurcation in combination with the commercially available Atrium* iCAST™ covered stent in patients with an unsuitable distal sealing site for a Zenith iliac leg component proximal to the common iliac bifurcation.

PRESERVE is an extended, multi-center, prospective, non-randomized trial. Patients with anatomy amenable to endovascular repair who meet study criteria will be enrolled. Because the Branch Endovascular Graft-Iliac Bifurcation is intended to maintain blood flow to the internal iliac artery and minimize the risk of associated clinical symptoms with the need for re-intervention, the primary assessment will be based on six-month freedom from patency-related intervention.

The Branch Iliac Endovascular Graft-Iliac Bifurcation was designed to reduce the risks of complications for patients with iliac aneurysms by preserving blood flow to the internal iliac. The Atrium iCAST balloon expandable covered stent offers a low foreshortened design and a one-step deployment technique that enhances placement accuracy.

Faculty Team

The Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy at Penn Medicine is currently the regional leader for carotid, aortic, and peripheral arterial repair surgeries, and is among the handful of research centers nationwide involved in clinical trials to expand the indications for endovascular stent grafts. These new indications will include previously underserved patient populations and complex and complicated aneurysmal disease, including juxtarenal and pararenal aneurysms.

Performing Endovascular Clinical Trials at Penn Medicine

Scott M. Damrauer, MD
Assistant Professor of Surgery

Ronald M. Fairman, MD
Chief, Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Clyde F. Barker-William Maul Measey Professor of Surgery

Paul J. Foley, III, MD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Surgery

Michael A. Golden, MD*
Associate Professor of Surgery

Benjamin M. Jackson, MD
Assistant Professor of Surgery J

Venkat R. Kalapatapu, MD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Surgery

Paul L. O’Donnell, DO‡
Clinical Assistant Professor of Surgery

Grace J. Wang, MD, FACS
Assistant Professor of Surgery

*Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
†Penn Medicine University City
‡Cape Regional Medical Center

Access

Patient appointments are available at:

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
3400 Spruce Street
4 Silverstein Pavilion
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine
Penn Heart and Vascular Center
East Pavilion, 2nd Floor
3400 Civic Center Boulevard
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
Department of Surgery
266 Wright Saunders Building
39th & Market Streets
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Penn Medicine University City
4th Floor
3737 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Penn Medicine Radnor
250 King of Prussia Road
Radnor, PA 19087

Penn Medicine Bucks County
Suite 140
777 Township Line Road
Yardley, PA 19067

Cape Regional Physician Associates
217 North Main St., Suite 104
Cape May Court House, NJ 08210


https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0vaPQ5yI4B3UWczZ3hFSjZ6RGc/edit





All images ©Cook Medical (Bloomington, IN), 2014.

Visit Penn Physician VideoLink to view physician-focused videos, Clinical Briefings and more from Penn Medicine.





Friday, December 5, 2014

Paired Kidney Exchange for Kidney Transplantation

The Penn Transplant Institute is a leading center for paired kidney exchange for kidney transplantation, a practice that depends largely upon the benevolence of anonymous, altruistic donors.


Principles and Principals of Paired Kidney Exchange
A common perception of paired kidney exchange is that the process involves single, two-way exchanges between recipients and altruistic donors within their circle of acquaintance or relation. In fact, this is rarely the case.

Almost always, despite friends and family members who were evaluated as live kidney donors, the recipient has failed to find an appropriate match. Incompatibility between donor/recipient pairs can come about not only because of blood type, but because the recipient has been sensitized by previous blood transfusions, previous organ transplants or previous pregnancies.

More often, paired kidney exchanges occur as chains initiated between a “non-directed,” anonymous, altruistic donor and a matched recipient and continued when a friend or relative of this recipient repeats the process by donating to a second matched anonymous recipient. If this person, too, is linked to an unmatched donor, that donor may be enlisted to continue the chain as a donor to another anonymous recipient. Donors in the chain who do not immediately find a matched recipient may choose to begin a separate chain as “bridge” donors from the original chain (see Figure 1).

At Penn, recipients and donors who are willing to participate in paired kidney exchange must undergo a comprehensive medical evaluation. During this stage, the kidney transplant and living donor transplant teams complete a series of evaluations to determine if the procedures are safe and appropriate for the respective recipients and living donors. Only when the team feels it is safe to proceed are the donor and recipient surgeries scheduled.

The benefit of paired kidney exchange is that it offers kidney recipient and donor pairs who aren’t blood and/or tissue-type compatible an alternative to deceased donor transplantation, thus increasing the number of kidney donors while diminishing competition for deceased donor kidneys.

Paired kidney exchanges also play a critical role in expediting transplants and thereby improving outcomes. According to the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the median waiting time among patients aged 18 to 65 in the US for a deceased-donor kidney in 2014 was 4.5 years, versus 185 days for patients participating in paired kidney exchange. The estimated six-month graft survival rate for patients having paired kidney exchange was 98.8%, compared to 95.1% for deceased donor kidney transplants. [1]

Case Study

Upon learning that 32-year-old Mr. B had end-stage kidney disease, his uncle, Mr. C, volunteered to donate a kidney to him. However, tests at the Penn Transplant Institute showed that Mr. C and Mr. B were not a compatible match. Subsequently, Mr. B entered the home dialysis program at Penn and was placed on the waiting list for a deceased kidney.

Several months later, a transplant coordinator at Penn contacted Mr. C and Mr. B to ask if they would be interested in participating in a paired kidney exchange. She explained that an anonymous altruistic donor, Mr. A, had been found compatible with Mr. B and had agreed to donate a kidney to him. The coordinator asked if Mr. C would consider becoming a kidney donor for an anonymous recipient for whom he was compatible.

Mr. C agreed to become a donor, and at Penn, was paired with Mrs. D. The chain would thus involve Mr. A donating a kidney to Mr. B, and Mr. C donating a kidney to Mrs. D. All four participants in the resulting exchange were found to be physically and psychologically prepared for transplant surgery. The four surgeries were scheduled to take place at Penn Medicine on the same day in separate operating rooms.

On the morning of the kidney exchange, Mr. A had surgery first, and his kidney was transplanted into Mr. B. Later that day, a similar exchange took place. This time, Mr. C’s kidney was transplanted into Mrs. D.

All four patients recovered without incident. In the days after surgery, Mr. C and Mr. B decided to meet the pair with whom they had been matched. All donors currently have functioning transplants, due in large part to the initial intervention of Mr. A, the initiating altruistic donor.

Adding to the success of this exchange, Mr. E, the husband of Mrs. D, initiated a second chain of paired exchange kidney transplants two months later by donating a kidney to Mr. F, thus becoming an altruistic “bridge” donor to this new chain.

1. State of the OPTN/UNOS KPD Pilot Program, DHHS 2014]

Faculty Team
The Penn Transplant Institute is home to kidney, liver, lung, heart, pancreas and hand transplantation programs, and is ranked among the top 10 multi-organ transplant centers in the country.

Performing Kidney Transplantation at Penn Medicine

Transplant Surgeons

Ali Naji, MD, PhD
Surgical Director, Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Program
Professor of Surgery

Peter L. Abt, MD
Associate Professor of Surgery

Matthew H. Levine, MD, PhD
Assistant Professor of Surgery

Paige Porrett, MD, PhD
Assistant Professor of Surgery

Transplant Nephrologists

Roy D. Bloom, MD
Medical Director, Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Program
Professor of Medicine

Melissa B. Bleicher, MD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine

Simin Goral, MD
Professor of Medicine

Robert A. Grossman, MD
Professor of Medicine

Mary Ann Lim, MD
Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine

Peter P. Reese, MD, MSCE*
Assistant Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology

Deirdre L. Sawinski, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine

Karen Warburton, MD*
Associate Professor of Clinical Medicine

Other Renal Physicians
Meera N. Harhay, MD, MSCE

Attending Physician
Jonathan S. Maltzman, MD, PhD
Assistant Professor of Medicine

Renal Nurse Practitioners
Christina Braun, MSN, CRNP
Carolyn Mylowe, MSN, CRNP
Gail Eastman, MSN, CRNP, CCTC
Jenna Angerstein, MSN, CRNP, CCTN

Transplant Surgery Nurse Practitioners
 Alva Moy-Daley, MSN, CRNP
 Julie Spaulding, MSN, CRNP

*Living Donor Team Nephrologists

Paired Kidney Exchange at Penn Medicine
Penn performed the first successful kidney transplant in 1966, and the Penn Transplant Institute is now a leader in the effort to increase paired kidney exchanges for kidney transplantation.
In partnership with the National Kidney Registry (NKR), a consortium of 72 transplant centers nationwide, the Penn Transplant Institute recently took part in the largest kidney exchange to be concluded in under 40 days and the second largest in history (ultimately involving 28 donors and 28 recipients).

In 2012, the US Department of Health and Human Services awarded the Penn Transplant Institute’s Kidney Transplant program a Silver Level Award. Penn is the only transplant center in the region and one of a select group of programs in the nation to receive this distinction.

In addition to its partnership with the NKR, the largest and most successful kidney transplant matching program in the US, the Penn Transplant Institute is a member of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). Outside of its participation with these organizations, the Transplant Institute has a large enough waiting list to initiate donor chains within its own programs.

Access

Penn Transplant Institute Kidney Transplant Program

The Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine
2 West Pavilion
3400 Civic Center Boulevard
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Renal Electrolyte and Hypertension
Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine
South Pavilion, 1st Floor
3400 Civic Center Boulevard
Philadelphia, PA 19104

Patients also evaluated at:

Penn Medicine Radnor*
250 King of Prussia Road
Radnor, PA 19087
* A facility of the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Penn Medicine Bucks County
777 Township Line Road
Yardley, PA 19067

Penn Medicine—1400 East Route 70
1400 East Route 70
 Cherry Hill, NJ 08034

Penn Medicine Woodbury Heights
1006 Mantua Pike
Woodbury Heights, NJ 08097

The contact number for recipients and donors is 215.662.6200.

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0vaPQ5yI4B3N295aUlxT1J2LWc/edit




Visit Penn Physician VideoLink to view physician-focused videos, Clinical Briefings and more from Penn Medicine.